Tag: moffett forklifts

The Moffett Forklifts tag covers articles, comparisons, and real-world takeaways for buyers who run piggyback forklifts and want to make smarter decisions on their next truck mounted forklift. Many fleets stick with Moffett Forklifts because the brand is familiar and widely used in lumber, roofing, masonry, and building materials delivery. But familiarity is not the same as best fit—especially when today’s jobsites demand tighter maneuvering, better gradeability, and reach that doesn’t punish your payload.
Across these posts, we compare Moffett Forklifts—including models like the M8 55.3P and M55.4P—against the Loadmac 855 Super Reach. The key difference: Loadmac’s integrated second reach (iSR) is engineered as a standard feature on the 855, while pantograph reach on comparable Moffett Forklifts can be rare and often adds significant weight, especially in 4-way configurations. That weight shows up as reduced legal payload, increased rear axle load, and more suspension fatigue over time.
If you’re currently running Moffett Forklifts, the switch to Loadmac is worth considering for practical reasons: lighter 4-way setups, less overhang when mounted, tighter turning radius in cramped drops, and stronger climbing performance on steep drives and uneven terrain. These posts also cover stability advantages from Loadmac’s fixed mast design with tilt and side-shift at the carriage for more precise fork placement, plus visibility and usability benefits that reduce operator fatigue.
We also reference competitive comparisons against Princeton models like the PB55X and PBX, because the decision usually comes down to which piggyback forklift delivers the most uptime with the least compromise. If your team is evaluating Moffett Forklifts versus Loadmac, this tag is your shortcut to the most relevant specs, field logic, and switch-worthy advantages.